phillip hammond chancellor

The Chancellor bought shares in a food technology company just months before it won a share of £560,000 government contract.

Hammond bought 15% of Cambridgeshire-based company Hydramach in October 2015, but did not declare them in the Register of Members’ Interests until December 2016.

The Daily Telegraph reports today that:

Months later – in April 2016 – Hydramach was one of eight companies which won the grant to develop low fat and low sugar soups, ready meals and sauces from Innovate UK, a tech start up quango run by the Department for Business.

Last night a former standards watchdog said Mr Hammond’s failure to make public his shareholding was “a serious failure” because “there is clearly a potential conflict of interest”.

So why didn’t Hammond declare this earlier?

His staff told the Telegraph that he didn’t declare it in his House of Commons’ register because “it didn’t meet their threshold for declaration”.

But the aide also said:

He declared his shareholding as part of the usual Ministerial interests process – as set out in the Ministerial Code – whilst Foreign Secretary.

But that doesn’t resolve the central issue: should MPs be allowed to buy shares in companies bidding for government contracts?

Hydramach’s director tells the Telegraph the company eventually “withdrew” from the proposed consortium and government contract, and declined to enter into the agreement with Innovate UK.

So neither the company nor Hammond benefited from the contract.

But it still raises troubling questions about whether elected officials should be allowed to buy shares like this.

And then politicians wonder why the people think they’re in it for themselves

  1. Blue Tories? Red Tories? We don’t wonder if they are in it for themselves, we know they are. Either when in office or setting themselves up for their ‘retirement’.

  2. Used to be a sex or a money scandal that brought down ministers. Seems to have descanded to outright corruption and deceit now. Still the culprits get away with it.

  3. Used to be a sex or a money scandal that brought down ministers. Seems to have descended to outright corruption and deceit now. Still the culprits get away with it.

  4. Yes I am horrified by the number of MPs who have shares in companies which will benefit from the privatisation of the NHS. Jack Straw you name it. I thnk this is outrageous and they should not just declare these shares, but be banned from owning them until they cease to be MPs – and perhaps for some years afterwards as well.

  5. Abhorrent. Ministers are effectively insider trading. Of course they should be banned from owning, working for or having shares in companies that go for govt contracts. Not only are they paid well but their lives are subsidised in expenses by the taxpayer. They should keep away from govt contracts whilst an MP and for some years afterwards. All in it together? Yes they are. No wonder we are at a post truth age of populism where nobody trusts a politician.

  6. Surely this is akin to insider trading, nobody is trying to tell us that they did’nt know who would get the contracts ! & T May still insists that this govt is fair for everyone.. BULLSH#T !

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.

1000

Comments are limited to 1000 characters.