Kids Company Matt Hancock

Kudos to Conservative Home — who report that their suggestion to extend the Freedom Of Information Act to publicly-funded charities and companies is apparently being considered by ministers:

“The rule ought to be quite simple – if you take taxpayers’ money, then you take on the responsibility to account for its use. That means the Freedom of Information Act should travel with taxpayers’ cash, ensuring that it is always under the protection of transparency whether it is spent by a company, a charity or a quango.

These fine words were published in the wake of the collapse of charity Kids Company … but if only it were that straightforward.

Having received multiple requests on the issue, the government itself has refused to release information on the scandal — in a process known to Whitehall mandarins as as ‘covering Matt Hancock’s arse’:

  • Refusing to release a 2014 audit of Kids Company, paid for by the Cabinet Office, which showed that the charity was in serious financial trouble
  • Refusing to disclose the grant agreement signed-off by Tory minister Matt Hancock, which accompanied cash handed over to Kids Company in spite of concerns raised by the auditors (and civil servants)

Scrapbook suspects as much money is wasted trying to exhaust the patience of applicants and contrive far-fetched exemptions than actually complying with the Act.

Don’t count on bungling execs at charities and public contractors behaving any differently.

  1. By publicly funded it should include any charity that makes use of significant tax breaks, as that costs the government a lot.

    logically it should appjunto anyone significantly benefiting from government largess.

    Of course that wouldn’t be allowed to happen, as it would include Tory Party Think-Tanks & public schools.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


Comments are limited to 1000 characters.