The Guardian are reporting that Gordon Brown and his family were the subject of a News International hacking and blagging operation which targeted bank accounts, legal files and his son’s medical records.

Revelations that The Sun obtained access to Fraser Brown’s confidential health files — while he was still an infant — may lead to a re-examination of an already-known episode of hacking involving the former prime minister, in which his own records were accessed by a medical professional working near his constituency.

In a story which went curiously unreported south of the border, a doctor was charged with offences under the Data Protection Act in late December 2008 but The Daily Record reported in January 2010 that the prosecution was to be dropped.

Andrew Jamieson sparked a security alert after breaking into confidential computer files on the PM and First Minister and a series of other high-profile Scots.Former Labour leader Jack McConnell and his wife Bridget had their sensitive files viewed. BBC newsreader Jackie Bird and Old Firm stars were among other victims.

We told in March how Jamieson, who worked at the Queen Margaret Hospital in Dunfermline, was charged and appeared on petition at Dunfermline Sheriff Court.Now all the victims have been told there will be no trial as the Crown say that is not in the public interest – even though there is enough evidence to prosecute.

Scrapbook understands that Dr Jamieson was not struck off by the GMC but instead gave official undertakings which would restrict his medical practice. While there is no evidence that Dr Jamieson accessed Fraser Brown’s records, today’s revelations will likely lead to a re-examination of the appearance of key stories regarding the health of Gordon Brown, and that of his family, in the British media.

Set against a backdrop of heightened concerns around leaks of confidential personal data, Dr Jamieson claimed at the time he looked at the files out of curiosity and a nameless “senior politician” was at pains to stress that the motive did not appear to be material gain.

So why wasn’t this reported properly in the English press at the time?

  1. Where did Andrew Marr get that scumbag question regarding Brown using/ abusing prescription drugs from?

  2. @dermo ,we all have our suspicions regarding that,i do hope that Mr Coulson is being asked the very same question.

  3. Former Labour voter says:

    A man that employed Damien McBride has no right to complain about the nefarious practices of others…

  4. Yes, “Former Labour voter”, because underhand political dealings are OBVIOUSLY of the same order of immorality as making off with the medical records of a serving chancellor’s seriously ill newborn son. I understand completely now.

    You know, some practices are actually MORE nefarious than others… or maybe you don’t. Maybe you regard any sin as equal to all sin. But something tells me you’d be the first to be crying foul were someone to make a Nazi comparison anywhere… odd, that.

  5. Strange how everyone is now rightly indignant and furious about the hacking of an innocent infant`s medical records, and yet all the same public demanded to know whether Tony Blair`s son, Leo had been given the triple jab… What has any of it to do with us ???!!!
    As if anything so private has anything to do with law-making and running the country !!

  6. chris gummer says:

    Is it feasible that Brown’s own advisers leaked the story to gain some public sympathy for the beleaguered Brown. They were a thick skinned bunch.

  7. If Brown knew about it and had allowed it, why would he be so vocal about condemning it now? Surely someone would then pipe up and say “you let us have it yourself, you dirty git”? Perhaps they’re waiting for a moment. But, as far as I can see, he’s never been one to parade his children in front of the press before, except when pushed by the media.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


Comments are limited to 1000 characters.