In a snub to his departmental staff in June, Michael Gove handed the administration of the Conservatives’ flagship “new schools” programme to a charity established only nine months previously. Gifting a public contract worth half a million pounds to an untested body would – by itself – raise eyebrows. But what has really quickened pulses in Whitehall is the transfer of cash without a tendering process to the New Schools Network run by Gove’s 25-year-old former political adviser Rachel Wolf.

The driving of coach and two horses through procurement procedures will not be news to followers of the The Other TaxPayers’ Alliance (OTPA) and Lisa Nandy MP, who have been pursuing the New Schools Network (NSN) doggedly for the past few months. Parliamentary questions from Nandy and a freedom of information request from OTPA show that:

  • The government have refused to disclose full details of the business case submitted by NSN.  Stonewalling by the Department for Education led to an intervention by the Information Commissioner, who ordered them to reply. The heavily redacted FOI response was finally received after a 70-day delay.
  • The DfE have no idea who NSN’s other donors are – and crucially – whether those donors would stand to benefit financially from the introduction of free schools.
  • Education ministers have dodged further questions around procurement, with the department claiming “no other tenders were sought from other organisations [because] NSN has been active in this area for some time”. It would appear that in this case “some time” means “since the charity was started less than a year ago”.

Despite being run by a former aide to the Education Secretary and its role driving the reform of schooling in Britain, the NSN is, as a private charity funded through a large taxpayer grant (and curiously publicity-shy donors), beyond the reach of freedom of information. Contrast this with the government’s recent rhetoric on transparency. Writing for ConservativeHome this month, Francis Maude boasted:

“The most startling difference between this administration and the last is the degree of honesty we have with the public … We have put government transparency at the heart of our approach … When it comes to transparency and openness, we want nothing less than radical culture change for the public sector.”

Perhaps Maude and Gove can reconcile this with the smoke and mirrors surrounding the New Schools Network?

  1. Pingback: Ben W
  2. Pingback: Andrew Holland
  3. Pingback: Boris Watch
  4. Pingback: Beau Bo D'Or
  5. Pingback: alan mills
  6. Pingback: Naushabah Khan
  7. Pingback: Derek Bryant
  8. Pingback: Olly Parker
  9. Pingback: Andy Bold
  10. Pingback: Fiona Millar
  11. Pingback: Richard Spencer
  12. Pingback: Nat
  13. Pingback: PSM
  14. Pingback: sunny hundal
  15. Pingback: Gill Powell
  16. Pingback: Sophie B-Clarke
  17. Pingback: Captain Disco
  18. Pingback: Maureen Czarnecki
  19. Pingback: Ron Gordon
  20. Pingback: Alex Murray
  21. Pingback: Graham Copp
  22. Pingback: Lovely Horse
  23. Pingback: Andrea Carr
  24. Pingback: David Mitchell
  25. Pingback: Jim Riley
  26. Pingback: Nat
  27. Pingback: Laura
  28. Pingback: LS Foundation
  29. Pingback: Michelle Welsh
  30. Pingback: eylanezekiel
  31. Pingback: Sharon Young
  32. Pingback: Scrapbook Flirt
  33. Pingback: Tony Parkin
  34. Pingback: Louise Haigh
  35. Pingback: BobToms
  36. Pingback: Tony Parkin
  37. Pingback: tom cooper
  38. Pingback: BobToms
  39. Pingback: Andrew Hobson
  40. Pingback: Anne Tierney
  41. Pingback: Edward T.Rifle
  42. Pingback: Ian Usher
  43. Pingback: Paul Northup
  44. Pingback: Mandy Honeyman
  45. Pingback: Andrew Hobson
  46. Pingback: William French
  47. Pingback: ray campbell
  48. Pingback: Leon Cych
  49. Pingback: Edupixel
  50. Pingback: Edudata
  51. Pingback: Bee
  52. Pingback: Anna Hedge
  53. Pingback: Tony Parkin
  54. Pingback: Tony Parkin
  55. Pingback: Martyn Farrows
  56. Pingback: Cheryl Reynolds
  57. Pingback: Alan Hart
  58. Pingback: penny patterson

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


Comments are limited to 1000 characters.