
Speaking on the Today Programme earlier, George Osborne has denied he is a highest rate taxpayer who would benefit from the 5% cut he announced yesterday. His £134,565 salary puts him just £15,435 shy of the higher rate (aka additional rate) tax band.
When challenged by Evan Davis that he had other sources of income which would put him over the line, Osborne retorted:
“I’m not, actually.”
But the Register of Member’s Financial Interests reveals he has been in receipt of rent from a property in London since at least July 2011.

What property in London can you rent for less than £16,000 per year?
UPDATE (09:14) »According to
DirectGov, rental income is still treated as a business, so not taxed as earned income. Is this how Osborne can make his claims today?
↑↑ Return to top of story ↑↑
UPDATE (09:28) »This is the house which Osborne's family lived in until they moved into Downing Street at exactly the same time the rental entry appears on the register. We somehow doubt you could rent this for less than £307 per week.
↑↑ Return to top of story ↑↑

UPDATE (09:41) »From DirectGov: “Your taxable profit from property letting
is added to your overall income. If this is more than your tax allowances
you'll pay tax on it at normal Income Tax rates.” -- unless you've set up some other legal vehicle?
↑↑ Return to top of story ↑↑
UPDATE (10:31) »The Guardian's
Polly Curtis is reporting that Osborne
owns a 15% share in family wallpaper firm Osborne & Little. But the firm
made a staggering loss in 2010-2011 and didn't pay dividends, so wouldn't contribute to his taxable income for the last year.
↑↑ Return to top of story ↑↑
UPDATE (11:45) »Scrapbook has spoken to a tax expert about
methods which Osborne may have used to keep his rental income out of his taxable income. The simplest would seem to be a
joint ownership with his wife owning a higher percentage of the property- Osborne then paying tax on less than half of the income. Alternatively, he could have
extensively refurbished the property after moving into Number 11, to
count the amount of the expenditure as deducatable. Both of these methods are, at present, legal
↑↑ Return to top of story ↑↑
↑↑ Return to top of story ↑↑
Number 10: "Tax arrangements are private between [ministers] and HMRC"