Tag Archives: expenses scandal

Benefit fraud average cost 31 times lower than MP expense overclaims

Efforts to portray every nearly single benefit claimant as “on the fiddle” stepped up a gear at the weekend with the DWP briefing the media with tabloid-ready “bizarre benefit fraud excuses”, including:

  • “We don’t live together – he just comes each morning to fill his flask.”
  • “I was carrying the ladders for therapy.”
  • “I never noticed my wife going to work.”
  • “He lives in a caravan in the drive.”
  • “It was my twin.”
  • “I didn’t know wife was at work – I’m in the shed.”

After George Osborne was accused by churches of exaggerating the scale of benefit fraud in October 2010, this latest move has led to renewed charges from charities that the government is “using unusual fraud cases to support changes which could have a serious and negative impact on the lives of hundreds of thousands of disabled people.”

Perhaps Iain Duncan Smith and his DWP spinners would benefit from some context. The £1.1 billion cost of fraud (a modest 0.7% of the total benefits spend) averages out to £59 across 18.5 million claimants.* In contrast, MPs were ordered to pay back £1.2 million in the wake of Thomas Legg’s inquiry into expenses, an average of £1,858 for the 646 members of the Commons.

Looking for offenders to castigate in press releases, the DWP ministerial team need not look beyond their own ranks: Chris Grayling claimed thousands to renovate a flat in central London – bought with a mortgage funded at taxpayers’ expense – even though his constituency home is less than 17 miles from the House of Commons; Steve Webb claimed for £8,400 in stamp duty after he sold his Westminster flat and bought another just 100 yards down the road.

Can the “quiet man” please turn down the volume on these smears?

*5.7 million working age claimants plus 12.8 million pension age claimants. Source: DWP Quarterly Statistics Summary

Nadine Dorries admits: I'm a liar!

It seems the honourable member for Mid Bedfordshire is finally coming to terms with her own mendacity. Desperation to escape the attentions of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards has seen Nadine Dorries lay claim to the concept of “fiction-based political blogging” in respect of her taxpayer-funded website:

“My blog is 70% fiction and 30% fact … I rely heavily on poetic licence and frequently replace one place name/event/fact with another.”

The report from the Commons watchdog cleared her of abusing parliamentary allowances for second homes. However the findings on the levels of sincerity displayed by Dorries during the investigation are daminng:

Comments made by Ms Dorries on her blog suggested that she spent the majority of her weekends in the constituency, whilst she had told the Commissioner that nearly all weekends were spent in her main home … The Commissioner accepts Ms Dorries’ explanation of the comments she made on her blog, but notes that they “provided a misleading impression of her arrangements” … There are discrepancies between some of the information that appeared on Ms Dorries’ blog and the information she supplied to the Commissioner during the investigation.

Scrapbook fondly recalls the following remark on Dorries from one Conservative partisan:

“She’s a liability, but she’s our liability!”

Somerset Tory Ian Liddell-Grainger tops Parliamentary nepotism league

“You get what pay for”, said Tory Ian Liddell-Grainger when defending the largest MP expense claims in the South West. “The majority of the money has been spent on staff costs. I employ slightly more people than most but they are a really good team.” So who are is superhuman troupe toiling day and night for the citizens of Bridgewater and West Somerset?

For the taxpayer, “getting what you pay for” means keeping ILG’s wife Jill and two twenty-something children Peter and Sophie on the Parliamentary payroll. The Somerset MP has topped Guido Fawkes’ nepotism survey, employing more members of staff sharing the same surname than any other MP.  Until his youngest daughter was no longer eligible, Liddel-Grainger’s claims for family travel were valued in the top 3% of all 640+ members.

While CCHQ attempted to keep the “deranged” MP under wraps during the election campaign, he still managed to infuriate voters by refusing to take part in debates with other candidates,  telling the BBC he ”did not have the time” to attend hustings.

Perhaps he was busy updating his “excellent pussy” blog?

In praise of Beau Bo D'Or

Cartoonist cum graphic artist cum video creative Beau Bo D’Or produces some of the most ingenious and skilfully executed visual satire full stop and the best on the British blogosphere by a country mile. It was therefore with some sadness that Scrapbook read he is taking a short break from blogging, which has been light recently owing to a health problem.

It was the stop-gap ‘best of’ post announcing his hiatus that drew this blogger’s attention to a year-old video given new relevance with the news of the now impending fraud trials of four parliamentarians. Cleverly linking the sarcastic materialism of Renton’s  “choose life” monologue in Trainspotting to MPs’ expense claims might well be worth spending an hour photoshopping Peter Viggers’ head onto a film poster:

Choose a fucking big television, Choose washing machines, cars, compact disc players, and electrical tin openers. Choose good health, low cholesterol and dental insurance. Choose fixed- interest mortgage repayments. Choose a starter home. Choose your friends. Choose leisure wear and matching luggage. Choose a three piece suite on hire purchase in a range of fucking fabrics.

But what BBDO produced was truly remarkable, superimposing the faces of MPs onto footage from the film frame-by-frame. Unsurprisingly, “it took ages”:

Should you still need convincing to follow @beaubodor check out Lord Ashcroft won’t you buy me a Mercedes Benz.

Get well soon.

Westminster STOP: CCHQ intervene on office services expenses scheme run by Tory MP's wife

A shady scheme which would send £10,000s of office expenses the way of two parliamentary staffers has been shut down by Conservative Party enforcers. Westminster START intended to charge Conservative MPs £2,500 per year plus VAT to perform rudimentary staff management.

The initiative was developed by Sam Mackewn and the Deputy Chairman of the Conservative Women’s Organisation Eve Burt, both of whom work for (and the latter is married to) the party’s Deputy Chairman Alistair Burt MP. Enquiries from Private Eye as to whether “setting up a business to make money from the reformed expenses system” was appropriate clearly spooked CCHQ, who ordered that the plug be pulled.

The website, which features the Conservative tree logo several times, now states that Westminster START is “unable to continue operating … due to circumstances beyond our control”. At the time of writing, other pages, including the description of services, are still visible.

“We were trying to do something that made things easier for people”, Eve Burt told Bedfordshire on Sunday. Yes – easier for bone-idle Conservative MPs who would, over the course of prospective five-year parliaments, shell out nearly £15,000 of of taxpayers’ money to a private enterprise because they can’t be bothered to manage their staff.

It transpires Mrs. Burt has form for this kind of nonsense. Appearing on Channel 4 News in the wake of scandal engulfing Derek Conway and other MPs who employed close family members (cough), Burt defended the practice of Members employing staff who “happen to be related” to them:

There is an argument in favour of a centralised more professional approach to human resources within the Palace of Westminster and Portcullis House, including formal union recognition for MPs’ staff, but this should be done by Parliament – not by MPs and their wives are trying to find new ways to fleece taxpayers.

Some people evidently still don’t get it.

Hat-tip: to the anonymous reader that pointed us in the direction of this story. Got gossip? You can tip Scrapbook off here.

Derek Conway's goodbye email

Derek Conway of “I’m going to pay my son £40k for nothing” fame is labouring under the delusion that the whole of parliament wants to keep in touch with him when the Estate bids him good riddance. The following email was sent to 645 MPs yesterday afternoon:

According to Wikipedia (so it must be true), the post-nominal letters TD do not designate a sexually transmitted disease or, as one of Scrapbook’s pals suggested, ‘total d**k’, but the Territorial Decoration. This reservist military honour was awarded in 1990.

Conway’s family pocketed nearly 20 times a trainee soldier’s annual wage.

Video: Tory Bear doorsteps Sarah Teather office in Brent

It may no longer be the only blog with a weekly video (click here if you haven’t seen Conor Pope’s vlog) but Guy News is becoming required viewing – even for guilty lefties who quickly alt-tab back to The Staggers when surprised by a comrade.

In an act of Labour/Conservative non-partisanship unlikely to be repeated in the next parliament, or indeed the next five months, expenses angel trougher Sarah Teather had been the subject of something of a pincer movement from red and blue bloggers this week. The coup de grace has been delivered today by Tory Bear who surprised the Brent Liberal Democrat campaign unit at their office. And hats off to Emily Nomates for her Chris Morris-esque skewering of Lord Pearson, giving him precisely the amount of rope needed to hang his racist and patronising self (you almost expect him to refer to her as “dear”):

Like an A-level politics essay in reverse, Scrapbook will round this post off with a quote (part of which was used above and can be viewed here):

“I’m frankly astonished that when we’re in the middle of a recession and constituents are coming to us complaining they can’t afford to live, they can’t affor to pay their bills that MPs are still claiming money that they must know is  morally unjustified” – Sarah Teather

Ahem.

EXCLUSIVE: Sarah Teather charged £1,700 of Lib Dem furniture, insurance and telephone bills to expenses

Brent East MP Sarah Teather has been dogged this week by revelations about expense claims for her constituency office and allegations that taxpayer money has been used for political campaigning (all articles here). Scrapbook can today disclose that, in addition to bills for her Parliamentary office, Sarah Teather has claimed for invoices worth £1,700 addressed to her local political party.

Despite strict rules stating that “claims cannot relate to party political activity of any sort” bills addressed to “Lib Dems”, “Brent Liberal Democrats” and “Brent East Lib Dems” were charged to Teather’s expenses, including invoices for furniture, insurance and telephone maintenance. The accounts for Brent Liberal Democrats show that the party pays nothing in rent, telephone, insurance and electricity charges, despite sharing such facilities with the Brent East MP.

A friendly Liberal Democrat source familiar with the office expenses system told Scrapbook:

“The working assumption is that Teather will have to pay at least some of this money back. You simply can’t claim for receipts addressed to your local party – especially when you share an office with them.”

In addition to bills to her local party, Teather has also submitted an invoice that appears to relate to the Election Agents Record System, used by Lib Dem campaigners during election campaigns. Such claims are especially damaging in the light of leaked Liberal Democrat documents describing the “divide between party political campaigning and MP campaigning” as a “grey area”:

Readers should keep an eye out for Guy News later today, which comes live from outside Teather’s office. In developments to come, further problems remain with the accounts submitted to the Electoral Commission.

One would hope that party treasurers would know what a “company” is.

  • GMB Remploy campaign
  • Follow us on Twitter