Did Piers Morgan mislead DCMS select committee on tabloid hacking?


As new allegations of phone hacking swirl around CNN primetime host Piers Morgan, he may yet come to regret the swashbuckling hubris of his performance at the DCMS select committee in 2003. Ranging much further than the behaviour of his own red top, the then Mirror editor gave a forceful defence of the entire newspaper industry over invasions of privacy. Political Scrapbook has the footage.

Then seven years into his tenure as editor, Morgan told MPs that the press should be “congratulated” on its ethical approach to privacy issues, characterising the questioning as a “ritual bollocking”. Committee chair Gerald Kaufman stepped in several times to reprimand Morgan for his “discourteousy”.

In a bravodo-fuelled performance, Morgan claimed unwisely that the press behaved “with sensitivity” towards war widows and “absolutely responsibly” towards Princes William and Harry. His former paper the News of the World was already targeting the phones of dead soldiers’ families and would be caught bugging royals just two years later.

What may really land Morgan in hot water, however, are claims relating to his personal knowledge of privacy:

“In terms of ordinary people, I just don’t believe that they’re intruded in an unjustified way. I don’t see evidence that that happens at the Mirror. I didn’t see evidence that that happened on the other papers that I’ve worked on.”

“If there are particular grievances about how the Daily Mirror has behaved, and I say that our record in this area is exemplary, exemplary. I don’t say this because we somehow got away with this, I say this because we operate the [PCC] Code of Practice effectively and seriously.”

The DCMS select committee will meet tomorrow to discuss recalling five people who gave evidence recently, including James Murdoch. Scrapbook is sure that Piers will be happy to clarify his previous outbursts in light of recent developments. From the sounds of things he may soon have a lot more free time on his hands.

Better get those bags packed.

3 Comments

  1. Richard says:

    Shame you didn’t post the full footage.

  2. [...] 29th, 2011 Piers In Parliament Political Scrapbook have been analysising Piers Morgan’s 2003 appearance before the Culture Media and Sport [...]

  3. Timmay says:

    “What may really land Morgan in hot water, however, are claims relating to his personal knowledge of privacy:”

    Is followed with Piers Morgan saying “In terms of ordinary people, I just don’t believe that they’re intruded in an unjustified way. I don’t see evidence that that happens at the Mirror. I didn’t see evidence that that happened on the other papers that I’ve worked on.”

    This is Morgan playing a shell game. He has first deflected from some of the issues by defining people as ordinary and not-ordinary He has then deflected further from it by admitting there are intrusions but believes they are justified. Piers pushes his malign weasel words further by saying that he hasn’t seen evidence of what he would define as unjustified intrusions. Here he is admitting to intruding into the private lives of ordinary people.

    In one paragraph Morgan has moved the argument away from asking Do the press intrude into private lives? to a more nuanced Do the press intrude into private lives without justification? The trick being that all the papers can hide behind it being justified from their point of view at the time they did the hacking/blagging/tapping because they had a suspicion or a story or a lead, even if it turns out to be nothing.

  4. Andy says:

    Is Morgan lying? Are his lips moving?

  5. [...] way for another appearance from the CNN presenter, which will doubtless be more contrite than the arrogant 2003 performance highlighted by Scrapbook yesterday.Writing in a letter to Committee chair John Whittingdale, she [...]

  6. [...] evidence uncovered, that he cleaned up The Mirror and should be congratulated for the same. He claimed: “If there are particular grievances about how the Daily Mirror has behaved, and I say that our [...]

  7. [...] by Leveson’s senior counsel, we may yet see Morgan resort to the swashbuckling hubris of his appearance in a DCMS session on privacy, in which he claimed that:the press should be “congratulated” on [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • Follow us on Twitter