The wheels are coming off David Cameron's Big Society policy

The policy which may come to define the coalition government has been significantly tarnished in the past 48-hours. A day after the “Big Society tsar” reduced his hours in the unpaid role to earn more money and “have more of a life” Liverpool has quit the flagship pilot project.

The leader of Liverpool City Council has written to David Cameron today to withdraw from the so-called “Vanguard scheme”. This is especially embarrassing as the city was chosen by the Prime Minister to launch the initiative in July:

The government has failed to deliver a single change that we have requested … Liverpool City Council can no longer support the Big Society initiative, as a direct consequence of your funding decisions

With the only Labour borough quitting leaves just three remaining projects: Eden Valley in Cumbria (independent), Windsor and Maidenhead (Tory) and the London Borough of Sutton (Lib Dem). The news comes after the beleaguered policy was linked with a failure by the Conservatives to win a majority in May.

Asked by Scrapbook for comment on the developments, DCLG seemed to disown the project:

The Big Society vanguards are led by local communities and people – not central government.

So why does each vanguard project need to be “supported by a dedicated team of civil servants” from, erm, central government? Wherever a failing programme can be linked in some way to local government it seems the canned response from Whitehall will be as follows:

Nothing to do with us guv’nor!

5 Comments

  1. Posted February 3, 2011 at 4:55 pm | Permalink

    u forgot to add the “labour leader” of liverpool council but dont let the facts get in the way of a good story eh?

  2. Posted February 3, 2011 at 5:45 pm | Permalink

    What are you on about, Harry? We say that it’s a Labour council in the post!

    Hurr durr!

  3. Posted February 3, 2011 at 5:59 pm | Permalink

    Particularly embarassing for Andrew Stunnell who was championing Liverpool’s involvement to the Localism Bill Committee only two days ago:

    From Hansard:

    Andrew Stunell: One of those authorities is the city of Liverpool, so if the hon. Lady had it in mind that we only went to radical right-wing authorities, that is not the case. The others are Windsor and Maidenhead, the London borough of Sutton and a project in Eden district council in Cumbria.

  4. Dave
    Posted February 3, 2011 at 6:12 pm | Permalink

    My home city of Liverpool – this makes me proud of you (and wonder why a Tory gov thought to vanguard the Big Society there in the first place).

  5. JB
    Posted February 3, 2011 at 7:20 pm | Permalink

    Exactly the answer the Tories will have to everything.
    “My hospital waiting times are too long” – “Talk to your GP, they’re in charge, not us!”
    “My children’s school is falling down!” – “It’s not our fault you didn’t take it over and build a new one yourself.”
    And so on, and so forth.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • Follow us on Twitter