Liam Fox's Atlantic Bridge referred to US tax authorities by Charity Commission

An organisation set up by the shadow defence secretary Liam Fox and linked to a string of other Conservative front benchers is under investigation by US tax authorities, Scrapbook can reveal. Atlantic Bridge, whose political activities have been subject to an official probe in the UK since October 2009, has been referred to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) by the Charity Commission. The investigation comes as an embarrassment to members of its advisory council, which include George Osborne, Michael Gove, William Hague and Chris Grayling.

The sham charity was set up with the ‘simple aim of “Strengthening the Special Relationship” exemplified by the Reagan-Thatcher partnership of the 1980s’ despite regulation clearly prohibiting party political activity. Hosting a book launch for William Hague and providing a $2,500 hotel room for a visiting US senator number amongst controversial activities which have drawn the attention of regulators on both sides of the pond.

The ruse used by Atlantic Bridge to fend off the authorities is to configure itself as two separate charities: one in the US and one in the UK, which was previously registered at Portcullis House. Problems in the UK are referred to the US jurisdiction and vice-versa despite accounts indicating that ”the two entities have been set up to mutually support each others aims”. The organisations are referred to by executives as a single entity and have executive and advisory councils and an honorary patron (Margaret Thatcher) in common.

It seems a recent press release and an article by the Atlantic Bridge CEO backing David Cameron was the last straw for the Charity Commission.  Correspondence between blogger Stephen Newton and the UK regulator seen by Scrapbook indicates Atlantic Bridge is now under investigation by the Internal Revenue Service:

As you will appreciate the Atlantic Bridge Inc is registered in the United States as a 501(c)(3) organisation with the IRS and therefore does not fall within the Commission’s jurisdiction. We have therefore notified the IRS of this information* – Charity Commission

As a 501(c)(3) organisation, the US-arm, Atlantic Bridge Inc, is “absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office”. One can only look askance at the following statement:

“Americans should look forward to May 6, after which Cameron and his government will likely assume power.   He will be good for America and better for the Special Relationship.” – Atlantic Bridge CEO Amanda Bowman

For Conservative shadow cabinet ministers, sitting on the management structures of an organisation responsible for rubbishing the NHS in US healthcare debates is reckless enough. It is apparently the case, however, that this body is also responsible for flying senior Conservatives and their US friends across the Atlantic at the expense of the British Treasury and UK taxpayers. As Newton (whose excellent articles on Atlantic Bridge are available available on his blog) writes:

As a higher rate taxpayer, a £1,000 trip to see comedian James Hirsen in LA, for example, would be covered by a £600 donation. The remaining £400 would then be claimed from British taxpayers. It sounds like an invitation to take part in well planned, systematic corruption.

The taxes this organisation has avoided paying could have been used to fund schools and hospitals. Perhaps hacks following Messrs Fox, Osborne, Hague and Grayling on the campaign trail should pose the following question:

How much tax has your organisation dodged?

*IRS analysts are currently acting on this communication and a complaint from Stephen Newton.

UPDATE 18:15 So, as Guido observes, the press release is a bit suspect. But the article is genuine and Bowman is clearly a shill for David Cameron during an election.

21 Comments

  1. Posted April 14, 2010 at 1:40 pm | Permalink

    That press release would be the one Guido filed as “Dirty Tricks”, no?

    The article doesn’t actually endorse anyone: it analyses the position of the person “…who will likely win the election, even if with a slimmer majority than predicted a few months ago.”

    501(c)(3)’s are allowed to discuss candidates’ positions – what they can’t do is campaign on their behalf (say by distributing their materials or statements).

  2. Posted April 14, 2010 at 2:30 pm | Permalink

    Perhaps Matthew has a short attention span. Had he made it to the end of Bowman’s piece he’d have read: ‘He [Cameron] will be good for America and better for the Special Relationship.’

    As his beloved Guido says, ‘How non-partisan is that?’

  3. tim
    Posted April 14, 2010 at 3:04 pm | Permalink

    This is so lame. I suggest that Stephen Newton–who ever you are– should try to get a life.

  4. Bill
    Posted April 14, 2010 at 3:48 pm | Permalink

    Matthew makes a good point, “short attention span” or no. I’m pretty sure that 501(c)3 does not preclude someone from commenting on ANY aspect of politics. Say, for example, a speculative piece looking at what the future might hold for a relationship between two nations.

    I’d also be highly interested in finding out who wrote the original, sham “press release” that is the root of that complaint. It’s clearly a hoax.

  5. tim
    Posted April 14, 2010 at 3:53 pm | Permalink

    Not to mention the fact that in America we have something called FREEDOM OF SPEECH.

  6. Bill
    Posted April 14, 2010 at 4:01 pm | Permalink

    Well, I suppose you could argue that giving credence to a phony “press release” is freedom of speech of sorts, isn’t it? I mean, even malicious fraudsters deserve their say, right? And if their ability to play fast an loose with the facts plays into your partisan agenda, hey, all the better. Who cares if the release is real? Someone wrote a blog post about it! A blog post!

  7. Andy
    Posted April 14, 2010 at 5:18 pm | Permalink

    Wow!
    So the Charity Commission led by arch Labour crony and queen quangocrat “Dame” Suzy Leather (never had a real job in her life) is on the case.
    This is dog bites man stuff.
    Perhaps they’d care to look at some of the Labour dodges too. John Smith Institute? Scott Trust?
    Perhaps they could look at “Lord” Paul. You know, the asset stripping, pension pot pilfering, non-domicile, tax dodging, but I’ll fill my boots with the absolute maximum Lords expenses gravy train cash like Udin, Paul. Now I bet he’s got some dodgy little “charity” somewhere

  8. Posted April 14, 2010 at 5:42 pm | Permalink

    So the press release is fake? I trust you’ll go over to order-order.com and give Guido a hard time about this as well? And the article on the Washington Examiner to which the press release refers. That must fake too, right?

    Take off the tin foil hats, boys.

  9. Bill
    Posted April 14, 2010 at 5:50 pm | Permalink

    Yes, the press release is fake. Political Scrapbook, please look at Guido’s two “updates” towards the bottom of his piece. He notes that whereas the op-ed piece is real, the press release labeling it an “endorsement” is not. He also says that he is filing this under dirty tricks until the author of the release, one “Shalia Cooper” comes forward. No need to give Guido a hard time, as he has already corrected the record.

  10. Posted April 14, 2010 at 6:18 pm | Permalink

    @Bill fair enough. Have updated the post. Now we’ve cleared that up perhaps we can concentrate on why Conservatives and their US friends are clocking up the airmiles at the expense of the taxpayer?

  11. Bill
    Posted April 14, 2010 at 6:32 pm | Permalink

    Thank you for updating the post.

  12. Posted April 14, 2010 at 6:37 pm | Permalink

    Believe me, you do not want to run afoul of US tax authorities, regardless of whether you are a liberal or a conservative.

  13. Posted April 14, 2010 at 10:17 pm | Permalink

    Now we’ve cleared that up perhaps we can concentrate on why Conservatives and their US friends are clocking up the airmiles at the expense of the taxpayer?

    Or, perhaps, why they’ve thrown big parties for war criminals, and carry apologetics for torture.

  14. Posted April 14, 2010 at 10:22 pm | Permalink

    The Charities Commission has written to the IRS. And? The IRS may well reply: “It’s not of your business, we have laws against trying to interfere with freedom of speech, here. PS. Dame? Suzi… Leather? Is that a REAL name?”

  15. Posted April 15, 2010 at 12:50 am | Permalink

    I find it slightly bizarre that you evidently didn’t bother to read Guido’s article, given it’s your only source for the existence of the press release – and the press release is the only thing you’ve got to support your claim of an endorsement.

    Was this damp squib really the piece about which you said yesterday “Working on serious story for tomorrow though. Will probably get picked up by print press (fingers crossed).”?

    One really salient question: Did you develop this yourself, or did someone suggest you might like to write it? If the latter, I’d venture to suggest that you might want to ask that person if they happen to know “Shaila Cooper”.

    You may not like the fact that the Atlantic Bridge has been flying shadow cabinet members to the US, but neither you – nor Stephen Newton – have anything to offer but innuendo and ignorance of US tax law.

    Tinfoil hats? I think you might want to check your own headgear.

  16. Peter Grimes
    Posted April 15, 2010 at 7:40 am | Permalink

    Does the Charity Commission have the authority to ‘refer’ the details of their ‘official probe’ to the IRS in the United States?

  17. Posted April 15, 2010 at 9:53 am | Permalink

    “Does the Charity Commission have the authority to ‘refer’ the details of their ‘official probe’ to the IRS in the United States?”

    It probably does. However, the IRS has every right and authority to ignore the UK Charity Commission.

  18. Posted April 15, 2010 at 2:30 pm | Permalink

    Good to see some people getting hot under collar here and as usual writing in ignorance. The IRS guidance on political campaigning is here:
    http://www.irs.gov/charities/charitable/article/0,,id=163395,00.html
    And you will see it says, ‘all section 501(c)(3) organizations are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office’

    Obviously, I’ve checked my facts and got the advice of a US lawyer who has confirmed that there is no geographic restriction on this guidance. That is, it applies to the UK general election.

    Bowman’s Washinton Examiner article may read like a parody, but she has confirmed that it is not:
    http://www.thirdsector.co.uk/news/Article/996221/Atlantic-Bridge-US-publishes-pro-Cameron-remarks/

    To be fair she does say the words, ‘He will be good for America and better for the Special Relationship’ should not be read an endorsement of Cameron.

  19. Bill
    Posted April 15, 2010 at 3:57 pm | Permalink

    Oh, I think I get it now! We’re playing semantics.

  20. Peter Grimes
    Posted April 15, 2010 at 5:21 pm | Permalink

    I thought that the CC problem was that there were 2 entities, and that it could not control the US one. The US entity might well take umbrage at a UK government directed quango snitching it to the IRS.

  21. Bill
    Posted April 15, 2010 at 5:36 pm | Permalink

    Peter, I’m sure they would take umbrage. Not that this spurious complaint to the IRS would hold any water. That is, assuming that the IRS is actually “investigating,” a claim which is pretty dubious in and of itself. Maybe their chief “investigator” is one Shaila Cooper? ;-)

52 Trackbacks

  1. By Political Scrapbook on April 14, 2010 at 1:25 pm

    EXCLUSIVE –> Charity Commission refers Liam Fox's Atlantic Bridge to US tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE

  2. By House Of Twits on April 14, 2010 at 1:25 pm

    RT @psbook EXCLUSIVE –> Charity Commission refers Liam Fox's Atlantic Bridge to US tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE

  3. By Les Crompton on April 14, 2010 at 1:28 pm

    RT @psbook: Liam Fox's Atlantic Bridge referred to US tax authorities by Charity Commission http://bit.ly/9bKixM

  4. By Richard Blogger on April 14, 2010 at 1:30 pm

    Tory campaign organisation, a faux charity, is reported to US tax authorities http://j.mp/9RBQ8v

  5. By House Of Twits on April 14, 2010 at 1:30 pm

    RT @richardblogger Tory campaign organisation, a faux charity, is reported to US tax authorities http://j.mp/9RBQ8v

  6. By Same Old Tories on April 14, 2010 at 1:34 pm

    RT @psbook EXCLUSIVE -> Charity Commission refers Liam Fox's Atlantic Bridge to US tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE #sameoldtories #ge2010

  7. By Andy Sutherland on April 14, 2010 at 1:36 pm

    EXCLUSIVE Charity Commission refers Liam Fox's Atlantic Bridge to US tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE /via @psbook #GE2010 #sameoldtories

  8. By Tribune on April 14, 2010 at 1:43 pm

    RT @psbook: EXCLUSIVE –> Charity Commission refers Liam Fox's Atlantic Bridge to US tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE

  9. By Derek Bryant on April 14, 2010 at 1:44 pm

    RT @psbook: EXCLUSIVE –> Charity Commission refers Liam Fox's Atlantic Bridge to US tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE

  10. By sponso RING on April 14, 2010 at 1:44 pm

    Liam Fox's Atlantic Bridge referred to US tax authorities by …: An organisation set up by the shadow defence sec… http://bit.ly/bAY7r7

  11. By Donovan Clarkson on April 14, 2010 at 1:50 pm

    RT @Uklabourparty: Liam Fox and other Tory front benchers are under investigation by US tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE #ge2010 RT

  12. By UK Labour Party on April 14, 2010 at 1:51 pm

    Liam Fox and other Tory front benchers are under investigation by US tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE #votelabour RT

  13. By UK Labour Party on April 14, 2010 at 1:54 pm

    EXCLUSIVE #LiamFox and other Tory front benchers under investigation by tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE #ukelection RT

  14. By Andy Buckley-Taylor on April 14, 2010 at 1:55 pm

    RT @Uklabourparty: Liam Fox and other Tory front benchers are under investigation by US tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE #votelabour RT

  15. By Mohammed Ahmed on April 14, 2010 at 1:55 pm

    RT @UKLabourParty EXCLUSIVE #LiamFox and other Tory front benchers under investigation by tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE #ukelection

  16. By Andrew Parrington on April 14, 2010 at 1:56 pm

    RT @psbook: Liam Fox's Atlantic Bridge referred to US tax authorities by Charity Commission http://bit.ly/9bKixM

  17. By Ahmed Ibrahim on April 14, 2010 at 1:56 pm

    RT @UKLabourParty: Liam Fox and other Tory front benchers are under investigation by US tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE #labourdoorst …

  18. By Donovan Clarkson on April 14, 2010 at 1:56 pm

    RT @UKLabourParty: EXCLUSIVE #LiamFox and other Tory front benchers under investigation by tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE #ukelection RT

  19. By Andy Buckley-Taylor on April 14, 2010 at 1:58 pm

    RT @Uklabourparty: Liam Fox and other Tory front benchers are under investigation by US tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE #ge2010 RT

  20. By UK Labour Party on April 14, 2010 at 2:06 pm

    @johnprescott Liam Fox + Tory front benchers are under investigation by tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE #labour RT

  21. By Thomas Earnshaw on April 14, 2010 at 2:07 pm

    RT @Uklabourparty: @johnprescott Liam Fox + Tory front benchers are under investigation by tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE #labour RT

  22. By Neil Pooran on April 14, 2010 at 2:10 pm

    RT @psbook: EXCLUSIVE –> Charity Commission refers Liam Fox's Atlantic Bridge to US tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE

  23. By Max on April 14, 2010 at 2:10 pm

    Dear @bbcnewsnight @paulmasonnews have u heard #LiamFox & other Tory front benchers under investign by US tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE

  24. By Danielle Murtagh on April 14, 2010 at 2:12 pm

    RT @Uklabourparty: @johnprescott Liam Fox + Tory front benchers are under investigation by tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE #labour RT

  25. By Phil Marsden on April 14, 2010 at 2:26 pm
  26. By Andy Buckley-Taylor on April 14, 2010 at 2:34 pm

    RT @Uklabourparty: @johnprescott Liam Fox + Tory front benchers are under investigation by tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE #labour RT

  27. By sunny hundal on April 14, 2010 at 2:41 pm

    Liam Fox's Atlantic Bridge referred to US authorities by Charity Commission http://bit.ly/9bKixM

  28. By Kevin McKeever on April 14, 2010 at 2:53 pm

    RT @psbook EXCLUSIVE -> Charity Commission refers Liam Fox's Atlantic Bridge to US tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE #sameoldtories #ge2010

  29. By Will Cameron on April 14, 2010 at 2:55 pm

    RT @pickledpolitics: Liam Fox's Atlantic Bridge referred to US authorities by Charity Commission http://bit.ly/9bKixM

  30. By Kevin McKeever on April 14, 2010 at 3:08 pm

    RT @psbook Charity Commission refers Liam Fox's Atlantic Bridge to US tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE #sameoldtories #ge2010

  31. By Duncan Hothersall on April 14, 2010 at 3:12 pm

    RT @psbook Charity Commission refers Liam Fox's Atlantic Bridge to US tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE #sameoldtories #ge2010

  32. By Adam Bienkov on April 14, 2010 at 3:15 pm

    RT @psbook Charity Commission refers Liam Fox's Atlantic Bridge to US tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE

  33. By Kerry McCarthy on April 14, 2010 at 3:16 pm

    @PaulNUK2010 You might find this interesting… http://bit.ly/byvyQP Although nothing will shift Fox!

  34. By Chris Paul on April 14, 2010 at 3:18 pm

    RT @AdamBienkov: RT @psbook Charity Commission refers Liam Fox's Atlantic Bridge to US tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE

  35. By Jamie McDonald on April 14, 2010 at 3:18 pm

    This story has it all, tax dodging, rubbishing the NHS, Charities Fraud,shadow cabinet. Cheers Dr Fucksake. #ukelection http://bit.ly/bnqo1F

  36. By Adam Fish on April 14, 2010 at 3:21 pm

    RT @pickledpolitics: Liam Fox's Atlantic Bridge referred to US authorities by Charity Commission http://bit.ly/9bKixM

  37. By krisjones1 on April 14, 2010 at 3:26 pm

    @benc4 Strange little story here – is C4N interested – http://bit.ly/caAM40

  38. By Green Steve on April 14, 2010 at 4:17 pm

    Hah! RT @pickledpolitics: Liam Fox's Atlantic Bridge referred to US authorities by Charity Commission http://bit.ly/9bKixM

  39. By NawtyNetworX on April 14, 2010 at 4:29 pm

    RT @UKLabourParty: EXCLUSIVE #LiamFox and other Tory front benchers under investigation by tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE #ukelection RT

  40. By Gwyneth Brain on April 14, 2010 at 5:09 pm

    RT @UKLabourParty: Liam Fox and other Tory front benchers are under investigation by US tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE #labour

  41. By Andy Buckley-Taylor on April 14, 2010 at 5:19 pm

    RT @UKLabourParty: DIY Tory front benchers under investigation by tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE #votelabour

  42. By Political Scrapbook on April 14, 2010 at 6:00 pm

    .@WilliamJHague You're on Atlantic Bridge's Advisory Board. Did you advise them to dodge all that tax too? http://is.gd/bsgLE

  43. By UK Labour Party on April 14, 2010 at 6:09 pm

    DIY Tory front benchers under investigation by tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE #votelabour

  44. By CharityAcrossAmerica on April 14, 2010 at 6:12 pm

    "Liam Fox's Atlantic Bridge referred to US tax authorities by …" http://bit.ly/cbdfGn Charity Across America

  45. By Andy Buckley-Taylor on April 14, 2010 at 6:19 pm

    RT @UKLabourParty: DIY Tory front benchers under investigation by tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE #votelabour

  46. By joey coco on April 14, 2010 at 6:37 pm

    RT @psbook: .@WilliamJHague You're on Atlantic Bridge's Advisory Board. Did you advise them to dodge all that tax too? http://is.gd/bsgLE

  47. By Andy Sutherland on April 14, 2010 at 7:36 pm

    .@WilliamJHague You're on Atlantic Bridge's Advisory Board. Did you advise them to dodge all that tax too? http://is.gd/bsgLE (via @psbook)

  48. By Continental Products on April 14, 2010 at 9:17 pm

    Liam Fox's Atlantic Bridge referred to US tax authorities by …: An organisation set up by the shadow defence sec… http://bit.ly/bAY7r7

  49. By Charity on April 14, 2010 at 10:10 pm

    Liam Fox's Atlantic Bridge referred to US tax authorities by …: Atlantic Bridge, whose political activities have… http://bit.ly/apdf5E

  50. By Colin Hall on April 14, 2010 at 11:20 pm

    RT @psbook: Liam Fox's Atlantic Bridge referred to US tax authorities by Charity Commission http://bit.ly/9bKixM

  51. By Nicolas Redfern on April 15, 2010 at 9:28 pm

    RT @psbook: EXCLUSIVE –> Charity Commission refers Liam Fox's Atlantic Bridge to US tax authorities http://is.gd/bsgLE

  52. [...] CV also includes periods advised John Major, Michael Howard and involvement with Liam Fox’s sham charity, Atlantic Bridge.Millionaire Dunlop was recently caught abusing a free parking pass on his trips [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • GMB Remploy campaign
  • Follow us on Twitter