Labour's REAL top-20 influencers on Twitter

UPDATE: Those who would prefer a more cerebral analysis (without another list!) should check out Sunder Katwala’s post from yesterday.

In the wake of Tweetminster’s report on Twitter and UK politics, Left Foot Forward have re-ordered Iain Dale’s list of the “Top 20 Labour Twitterers” using Edelman’s TweetLevel service. One of the headline findings from Tweetminster’s research was that Labour’s twitter presence is composed of a broad movement of activists rather than “official” accounts and key players in the party machinery. This is reflected in Dale’s list, based purely on follower numbers, by the conspicuous absence of a number of key left-wing influencers such as Jessica Asato and grassroots activists like Kevin Peel.

Nine months ago, follower numbers may have served as a decent rule of thumb for comparing the relative reach of different tweeters (see Blackburn Labour’s list from April). In January 2010, however, better methods to measure influence  are available that are based on metrics such as re-tweets. These have been developed by startups like Tweetminster and communications professionals such as Edelman who have thrown not insignificant sums of money at their development and (unlike Iain Dale) don’t have an axe to grind:

Labour bloggers have been happily retweeting all evening that the next election on Twitter will be between the “Tory machine” and “Labour’s grassroots activists”. This was the way Tweetminster put it in their report, published today. Assuming that party officials, candidates and MPs are defined as the “party machine” I’d say Tweetminster have got it the wrong way round judging by these two lists. Twelve out of the Top 20 Labour tweeters are in the party machine, compared with 11 Tories.

Iain Dale blazed a trail to become the UK’s first “name” political blogger in large part by burnishing his credentials as an independent thinker: ”Tory but not slavish”. The above paragraph, however, is an insult to the intelligence of his readers and a good example why many of Scrapbook’s politico friends have stopped reading him.

Below is an update of Left Foot Forward’s list, including many tweeters absent from Dale’s original numerology. The numbers in brackets are the score given by TweetLevel. Of course, if you’ve been missed off then let Scrapbook know in the comments.

1: Tom Watson (69)

2: Sarah Brown (67)

3: Grace F-H (66)**

4: Ellie Gellard (65)

4: John Prescott (65)

5: Kerry McCarthy (64)

5: Tracey Cheetham (64)

6: Alastair Campbell (63)

7: Wes Streeting (61)

8: Tim Cheetham (60)

9: Kevin Peel (59)**

9: Labour List (59)

9: Claire Spencer (59)

10: Sunny Hundal (58)

10: Tom Scholes-Fogg (58)

11: Labour Matters (56)

11: Liberal Conspiracy (56)

12: Adam Bienkov (55)

12: Tom Harris (55)

12: Political Scrapbook (55)

13: Conor Pope (54)

13: The Fabian Society (54)

13: Northern Heckler (54)

14: Sunder Katwala (53)

15: Anthony Painter (52)

15: CathElliott (52)

15: Lord Paul Drayson (52)

16: Alex Smith (51)

16: Chris Paul (51)

16: Ed Balls (51)

16: Jessica Asato (51)

16: Jim Knight (51)

16: Luke Pollard (51)

16: Adam Connell (51)

17: Tom Miller (50)

17: Co-operative Party (50)

18: Stuart Bruce (49)

18: Will Straw (49)

18: Paul Williams (49)

19: Jon Worth (48)

19: sion simon (48)

19: Left Foot Forward (48)

19: Jack Hart (48)

20: Tudor Evans (47)

20: Kevin Maguire (47)

20: Sadiq Khan (47)

21: Kerron Cross (46)

21: Ben Folley (46)

22: David Miliband (45)

22: Gemma Tumelty (45)

22: Sally Bercow (45)

A special mention should go to Labour’s first couple of Twitter. No, not Ed and Yvette but Tim (7th 8th) and Tracey (4th 5th).

Aww, how tweet!*

*Sorry.

UPDATE II:** The original list above is now updated below to include many Labourites that were left off (and Sunny Hundal)! The statistician George Box said that “all models are wrong, but some are useful”. In this vein, a few people were the first to admit their surprise at making this list, seeming to uncover some issues with the TweetLevel metrics. But, even discarding such outliers completely, such tools nevertheless reinforce Tweetminster’s findings that the Labour grassroots take the lead in the party’s efforts online.

22 Comments

  1. Claire Spencer
    Posted January 26, 2010 at 9:18 pm | Permalink

    I (@thedancingflea) have just checked, and I come in at 59! x

  2. Posted January 26, 2010 at 9:20 pm | Permalink

    I’m sad enough to have gone to TweetLevel to see what my score is…I’m a 51.

  3. Posted January 26, 2010 at 9:22 pm | Permalink

    (Glad I’m not the only one Claire.. didn’t see your comment there before I posted mine!)

  4. Posted January 26, 2010 at 9:22 pm | Permalink

    Again – why do you folks keep forgetting the non-Labour lefties?

    Also, I think the Edelman metric is all over the place. Doesn’t make any sense to me. At least Tweetminister measured specific things (like how many times you were re-tweeted etc etc and followers – which I now think is a crap measure).

  5. Posted January 26, 2010 at 9:22 pm | Permalink

    Agree with point about Iain Dale of course :)

  6. Claire Spencer
    Posted January 26, 2010 at 9:24 pm | Permalink

    I know, we are so weak. :P

  7. Posted January 26, 2010 at 9:26 pm | Permalink

    http://tweetlevel.edelman.com/user/msgracefh – 66. Not sure what that means!

  8. Posted January 26, 2010 at 9:28 pm | Permalink

    I’m sure I left a comment on here too….? Anyway – annoying to see non-Labour lefties not being included. I’m 58. Libcon is 59….

  9. Posted January 26, 2010 at 9:29 pm | Permalink

    Means your the third most influential Labour tweeter if included in this list Grace!

  10. Posted January 26, 2010 at 9:30 pm | Permalink

    I score 54 on Tweetlevel. @northernheckler. Have also blogged on the ridiculousness of Iain Dale’s list : It’s not about the number – http://wp.me/pycui-hd

  11. Posted January 26, 2010 at 9:43 pm | Permalink

    I scored 58

  12. Posted January 26, 2010 at 10:08 pm | Permalink

    I scored 49. I don’t think Tweet Level is all that great ;)

  13. Posted January 26, 2010 at 10:11 pm | Permalink

    46 for me… But how were the people in the list identified? They must have missed a lot of other Labour tweeters.

  14. Posted January 26, 2010 at 10:11 pm | Permalink

    @CoopParty is at 50 – still some work to do.

  15. Posted January 26, 2010 at 10:13 pm | Permalink

    I don’t get RT’d nearly enough! But goodness me I do a lot of RT’ing? Deserve better. Just on a boring technical question are the old school hand RT and the new Twitter RT feature treated equally in this exercise? And if the Tweetminster analysis is correct would we expect the list of active solid gold tweeters to be deeper than that of the spoilt ones?

  16. Posted January 26, 2010 at 10:14 pm | Permalink

    PS and what happens to “via”, open replies and other mentions?

  17. Posted January 26, 2010 at 11:18 pm | Permalink

    Looks like the conclusion is that these sort of algorithms suck? ;)

  18. Conor
    Posted January 27, 2010 at 2:32 am | Permalink

    My ‘influence’ is almost entirely based on people RTing my #REALdavefacts. I’ve waited a long time for the day when influence is based on how good ou are at making stuff up about David Cameron.

  19. Posted January 27, 2010 at 12:16 pm | Permalink

    I think you are probably wasting your time with Tweetlevel. It doesn’t offer this level of precision, and I suspect over emphasises ping-pong pettiness (sorry!).

    I gave them extensive feedback 2 weeks after launch demonstrating fluctuations of up to 5-10 points within a week on a sample of a number of “top political tweeters” from both left and right.

    If you want another metric, then try Twitter Grader.

    Having said that, I’m out of penis size competitions for the next few months.

    Oh for a cosmic Bobbit to cut them all off! Twankers.

  20. Posted January 27, 2010 at 12:57 pm | Permalink

    @Matt Wardman: Agree on ping-pong posts skewing TweetLevel and issues with granularity.

    But even such a blunt tool can still help to show that narrow “followers = influence” falls flat on its face when other metrics are brought in, a notion that is intuitive to anyone who uses Twitter regularly anyway.

    Off with their twocks!

  21. Posted January 27, 2010 at 1:03 pm | Permalink

    @Chris Paul: I think the system might distinguish from mentions and actual RTs (Tweetminster does). The “RT” format has now gained the official endorsement of Twitter, so sceptical as to whether “via” and other notations are counted as RTs.

  22. Posted January 27, 2010 at 3:20 pm | Permalink

    I’m sure this has already been mentioned, but I think TweetLevel’s off. If it’s true, my (@ralasdair)’s TweetLevel of 50.3 should put me above Will Straw, Left Foot Forward, and David Miliband!

24 Trackbacks

  1. By Political Scrapbook on January 26, 2010 at 9:03 pm

    New post –> Labour's REAL top-20 influencers on Twitter http://bit.ly/aoggLl

  2. By Kira on January 26, 2010 at 9:07 pm
  3. By Ellie Gellard on January 26, 2010 at 9:14 pm

    so. many. lists….RT @psbook: New post –> Labour's REAL top-20 influencers on Twitter http://bit.ly/aoggLl

  4. By Political Scrapbook on January 26, 2010 at 9:16 pm

    Influence purely by followers is sooo 2009! @nextleft @alexsmith1982 @Jessica_Asato all absent from @iaindale's list http://bit.ly/aoggLl

  5. By alexsmith1982 on January 26, 2010 at 9:20 pm

    Damnstraight> RT @psbook Influence by fllwrs sooo 2009! @nextleft @alexsmith1982 @Jessica_Asato not on @iaindale list http://bit.ly/aoggLl

  6. By Samuel Tarry on January 26, 2010 at 9:21 pm

    RT @psbook: Influence purely by followers is sooo 2009! @nextleft @alexsmith1982 @Jessica_Asato all absent from @iaindale's list http://bit.ly/aoggLl

  7. By Labour List on January 26, 2010 at 9:23 pm

    RT @psbook Influence by fllwrs sooo 2009! @nextleft @alexsmith1982 @Jessica_Asato not on @iaindale list http://bit.ly/aoggLl

  8. By MarkHanson on January 26, 2010 at 9:25 pm

    RT @psbook Influence by fllwrs sooo 2009! @nextleft @alexsmith1982 @Jessica_Asato not on @iaindale list http://bit.ly/aoggLl

  9. By Gareth Wyn Abbit on January 26, 2010 at 9:25 pm

    RT @psbook: New post –> Labour's REAL top-20 influencers on Twitter http://bit.ly/aoggLl

  10. By Ellie Gellard on January 26, 2010 at 9:27 pm

    RT @MarkHanson: RT @psbook Influence by fllwrs sooo 2009! @nextleft @alexsmith1982 @Jessica_Asato not on @iaindale list http://bit.ly/aoggLl

  11. By Ben Furber on January 26, 2010 at 9:29 pm

    Seriously @wdjstraw and @psbook, why are you writing this crap? (http://bit.ly/4QKIWJ + http://bit.ly/aoggLl)

  12. By Chris Paul on January 26, 2010 at 9:30 pm

    RT @BevaniteEllie: RT @MarkHanson: RT @psbook Influence by fllwrs sooo 2009! @nextleft @alexsmith1982 @Jessica_Asato not on @iaindale list http://bit.ly/aoggLl

  13. By Jamie Sport on January 26, 2010 at 9:38 pm

    Amen. RT @benfurber: Seriously @wdjstraw and @psbook, why are you writing this crap? (http://bit.ly/4QKIWJ + http://bit.ly/aoggLl)

  14. By gemma tumelty on January 26, 2010 at 9:38 pm
  15. By House Of Twits on January 26, 2010 at 9:39 pm

    RT @psbook: Influence purely by followers is sooo 2009! http://bit.ly/aoggLl

  16. By Philippa Willitts on January 26, 2010 at 9:41 pm

    Oh my, @CathElliott is on this list! http://bit.ly/aoggLl

  17. By Tracey Cheetham on January 26, 2010 at 9:52 pm

    RT @psbook: New post –> Labour's REAL top-20 influencers on Twitter http://bit.ly/aoggLl

  18. By Lisa Jackson on January 26, 2010 at 9:59 pm

    :D RT @tchee: RT @psbook: New post –> Labour's REAL top-20 influencers on Twitter http://bit.ly/aoggLl

  19. By Jessica Asato on January 26, 2010 at 10:03 pm

    Nice to see St George's ward candidates (me and @alexsmith1982) are joint 14 in @psbook's Twitter influencers list… http://bit.ly/aoggLl

  20. By Laura on January 26, 2010 at 10:15 pm

    Labour's REAL top-20 influencers on Twitter | Political Scrapbook: In the wake of Tweetminster's report on Twitter… http://bit.ly/bqBku6

  21. By Kevin Peel on January 26, 2010 at 11:16 pm

    is sceptical and amused to see his name as the 8th most influential Labour Tweeter on the @psbook list! http://bit.ly/aoggLl

  22. By James Hepplestone on January 26, 2010 at 11:20 pm

    RT @kevpeel: is sceptical and amused to see his name as the 8th most influential Labour Tweeter on the @psbook list! http://bit.ly/aoggLl

  23. By Jack Hart on January 27, 2010 at 9:16 am

    At least I know I rate above @SallyBercow, @DMiliband, @SadiqKhan & @Kevin_Maguire http://bit.ly/aoggLl – Even if it is a floored poll…

  24. By Political Scrapbook on March 1, 2010 at 4:53 pm

    @clrjones Great e.gs of Tweeting Labour MPs are @KerryMP @Andrew_GwynneMP. More here http://bit.ly/aoggLl and here http://bit.ly/afmA4C

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • GMB Remploy campaign
  • Follow us on Twitter